I wanted to discuss something that might seem a bit out of left field, but I believe it’s highly relevant. I’m fascinated by radical ideas—those that challenge the mainstream narrative and push our thinking to the limits. No one has done this more impressively recently than Terrance Howard during his interview on the Joe Rogan Podcast. It was utterly mind-blowing.
This blog isn’t about debunking or agreeing; it's about summarising my “understanding” to keep the conversation going. With my limited knowledge, I'll share what I've gathered so far. I've also watched debunking videos for a balanced view, but most seem to be very left-brained critiques of a theory that's challenging to articulate, straddling the line between scientific and spiritual realms. Expressing profound inner wisdom and a deep sense of knowing in words is incredibly difficult, even at the best of times. I champion new thoughts and ideas, and this seems to be an old idea expressed with a fresh perspective.
For those who haven't seen the podcast, you can watch it here.
My aim isn’t to prove anything—just to continue the conversation and perhaps convey his ideas in my words. Ultimately, it doesn’t matter if he’s wrong; it could inspire the right mind to take it further. His ideas resonate deeply with me, aligning with my worldview shaped by meditation and spiritual experiences. However, I might be talking nonsense. The biggest issue in science and life is thinking we have all the answers. It takes radical minds to challenge this, helping us expand, evolve, and understand our world inside and out.
This isn't a detailed, minute-by-minute review of the interview. Instead, it's a synopsis of my understanding of what he said during the interview and the incredible document I read. Please leave your comments below so we can continue this incredible conversation!
So, without further ado, here is my breakdown of this mind-blowing interview. Strap in!
Mathematics
Terrence Howard doesn’t ease us in gently by any stretch of the imagination. After he finished recounting the memory of his own birth (Loved that) he opens by stating "1x1 = 2" as a way to challenge conventional mathematical thinking and to introduce his unique perspective on the nature of numbers and multiplication.
Here’s my explanation of his reasoning:
Concept of Multiplication:
Howard interprets the word "multiply" to mean making more of or increasing the quantity. He finds it contradictory that multiplying 1 by 1 results in 1, as this does not align with the idea of producing more or creating something additional. This actually spoke to me, because as a child I could not get my head around the concept of multiplying (making more of something) and arriving at the same number.
Natural Processes:
He draws parallels with natural processes, where combining elements typically results in a new entity or an increase. For example, combining hydrogen atoms to form H2 (a molecule) rather than just remaining as individual hydrogen atoms.
Philosophical and Mathematical Challenge:
Howard suggests that if multiplication is supposed to reflect natural growth and creation, then multiplying any number by itself should result in a larger quantity, not the same one. He uses this as a basis to argue that 1x1 should equal 2 because this would better represent the concept of creation and increase inherent in the term "multiply."
In essence, Howard’s issue is with the conventional interpretation of multiplication. He believes that multiplication should inherently involve an increase or creation of something more, which he feels is not represented by the traditional equation 1x1=1. This perspective aligns with his broader quest to rethink mathematical principles in a way that he feels more accurately reflects natural phenomena and philosophical insights.
Fractals
Terrence Howard references fractals and the Fibonacci sequence to illustrate natural processes of doubling and expansion, which he believes support his unconventional mathematical view that 1x1 should equal 2.
Fractals are intricate geometric shapes that can be split into parts, each of which is a smaller copy of the whole. This self-similarity is a common feature in nature, seen in everything from snowflakes to coastlines. The Fibonacci sequence, on the other hand, is a series of numbers where each number is the sum of the two preceding ones. This sequence frequently appears in natural patterns, such as the arrangement of leaves on a stem or the branching of trees.
Howard suggests that these naturally occurring patterns provide evidence for a different way of understanding multiplication and growth. In his view, the process of doubling and the recursive nature of fractals and the Fibonacci sequence illustrate that combining two singular entities can result in an expansion that defies traditional arithmetic.
For instance, in nature, when one cell divides, it doesn’t result in the original cell remaining plus an additional cell—it results in two cells, both of which are full entities in their own right. Similarly, in fractals, a single shape can expand into a more complex pattern without losing its original form, effectively multiplying in complexity and presence. Howard believes these patterns reflect a deeper, more intuitive understanding of multiplication and growth, suggesting that in some contexts, 1x1 could conceptually result in 2.
This idea challenges the conventional mathematical framework, proposing that our traditional arithmetic might not fully capture the dynamic and expansive nature of real-world growth and multiplication. Howard's interpretation is rooted in the observation of natural phenomena, where the process of doubling is a fundamental aspect of development and evolution.
Relative Factors and Universal Perspective
Terrence Howard argues that to truly understand any phenomenon, one must consider the relative context in which it exists. This involves examining how elements interact and influence each other within a system, rather than viewing them in isolation. He believes that a holistic approach, which accounts for the interdependencies and relationships among elements, provides a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of the world.
Objective Perspective
By considering these relative factors, Howard believes we can achieve a clearer and more objective perspective on complex matters. He suggests that ignoring the interconnectedness of elements leads to a narrow and potentially misleading understanding of the universe. Recognising the relative context allows us to see the bigger picture and understand the true nature of phenomena, free from the distortions of isolated analysis.
Myopic View
Howard warns that a failure to consider relative factors results in a dangerously myopic view of the universe. This limited perspective can encourage outdated and incorrect ideologies that do not reflect the dynamic and interconnected nature of reality. Such a narrow viewpoint can hinder our ability to adapt and evolve our understanding, leaving us with an incomplete and inaccurate model of the world.
Obsolescence and Extinction
Howard emphasises that clinging to these outdated views can render humanity obsolete. He argues that by failing to adapt and evolve our understanding of the universe, we risk stagnation and eventual extinction. The dynamic nature of reality requires us to continuously update and refine our knowledge, embracing new perspectives and insights. Without this adaptability, humanity may find itself unable to keep pace with the ever-changing world, ultimately facing obsolescence.
Howard advocates for a holistic approach to understanding phenomena, emphasising the importance of relative context and interconnectedness. By doing so, we can achieve a more accurate and objective perspective, avoiding the pitfalls of narrow and outdated views. This adaptability is crucial for the continued evolution and survival of humanity in an ever-changing universe.
The Elements & The Periodic Table
Terrence Howard discusses the idea of elements having tones, such as being in the key of E, which seems to suggest that he perceives elements musically. This concept is both beautiful and resonates deeply with my understanding of the world, especially through my experiences with deep meditation, ayahuasca and synaesthesia.
It seems he proposes that elements have unique vibrational frequencies or tones, analogous to musical keys. (How poetic is that?) This concept might suggest that elements resonate at specific frequencies, potentially corresponding to musical notes like the key of E. Howard's idea appears to blur the lines between science and metaphysics, suggesting a deeper, almost musical order to the universe.
While he doesn't provide exhaustive scientific details, his metaphorical language aligns with a more holistic, almost spiritual perspective of reality. This interpretation resonates with those of us who have had experiences with ayahuasca, or other deeply spiritual experiences which often lead to a perception of interconnectedness and harmony in the world. However, needless to say, the exact scientific validity and implications of his ideas are still up for debate and interpretation.I am excited to see how this evolves!
The Periodic Table
Howard has expressed unconventional views about the periodic table, suggesting that it is fundamentally flawed. He argues that the traditional representation of the periodic table does not accurately depict the true relationships and properties of elements. According to Howard, the current model oversimplifies the complexities of atomic structures and their interactions.
Howard proposes an alternative perspective where the elements are organised based on their vibrational frequencies or tones, as mentioned before. He believes that by understanding these frequencies, we can gain a deeper insight into the nature of matter and its behaviour. This approach challenges the established scientific understanding and suggests a more dynamic, interconnected view of the elements.
In his view, the traditional periodic table fails to capture the essence of how elements truly interact and resonate with each other. He envisions a more holistic model that incorporates these vibrational aspects, aligning with his broader perspective of a universe where everything is interconnected through frequency and vibration.
Terrence Howard referred to the work of Walter Russell, an American polymath known for his alternative views on the nature of the universe, which include a different interpretation of the periodic table. Walter Russell's ideas challenge the conventional scientific understanding and propose a more holistic, energy-based approach to the organisation of elements.
Image from - https://medium.com/@Matthew_Thomas/recap-discussion-jre-2152-terrence-howard-5031c201bac3
Russell's periodic table, also known as the "Russell Periodic Chart of the Elements," organises elements based on their energetic and vibrational properties rather than just their atomic number and chemical behaviour. He suggested that the periodic table should reflect the wave-like nature of elements and their relationships to each other in a more dynamic and interconnected manner.
Howard's reference to Russell's work aligns with his own ideas about vibrational frequencies and the interconnectedness of all things, presenting an alternative perspective on how we might understand the fundamental building blocks of matter.While his ideas are controversial and not widely accepted in the scientific community, they offer an intriguing blend of scientific inquiry and metaphysical thought, inviting us to reconsider our fundamental assumptions about the nature of matter and the universe.
Hydrogen
Terrence Howard emphasises hydrogen, the simplest and most abundant element in the universe, as the cornerstone for understanding the fundamental nature of the cosmos. He suggests that hydrogen's unique properties and its ability to transform into other elements under various conditions pose significant challenges to conventional scientific views.
In traditional science, hydrogen is understood as the first element in the periodic table, consisting of one proton and one electron. It is the building block of the universe, playing a crucial role in the formation of stars and the synthesis of heavier elements through nuclear fusion. Howard, however, takes this a step further by proposing that hydrogen's transformations and interactions are not fully explained by standard chemical and physical theories.
Howard posits that hydrogen, due to its simplicity and prevalence, embodies the fundamental principles of matter and energy. He suggests that under certain conditions, hydrogen can morph into other elements, a process that he believes is more intricate and significant than currently acknowledged. This idea challenges the established scientific understanding of atomic structure and element formation, proposing a more dynamic and fluid interplay of elements at a fundamental level.
According to Howard, this perspective aligns with the theories of Walter Russell, who also viewed hydrogen as a pivotal element. Russell's work proposed that all matter is interconnected through vibrational energy, with hydrogen serving as a primary conduit for these transformations. Howard's focus on hydrogen aims to highlight these transformative processes, suggesting that a deeper understanding of hydrogen could unlock new insights into the nature of the universe.
Natural Phenomena as Evidence
Terrence Howard uses natural phenomena such as hurricanes and tornadoes to illustrate and support his theories about the fundamental principles of the universe. He argues that these powerful and dynamic processes are not just weather events but also manifestations of deeper, underlying mathematical and physical principles.
Howard suggests that by observing and understanding the patterns and behaviours of hurricanes and tornadoes, we can gain insights into the fundamental nature of matter and energy. He believes these natural phenomena exemplify the intricate and often chaotic interactions that govern the universe. For instance, the spiralling motion of a hurricane or tornado could be seen as a macroscopic representation of the same forces and principles that operate at the atomic and subatomic levels.
This perspective challenges the traditional approach to mathematics and physics, which often relies heavily on abstract theories and equations. Instead, Howard advocates for a more empirical approach, where natural phenomena provide direct evidence and inspiration for developing mathematical principles. He believes that by studying the natural world and its complex behaviours, we can discover new patterns and relationships that might otherwise remain hidden in purely theoretical models.
Terrence Howard's ideas profoundly resonate with me on a spiritual level, aligning closely with my belief that we are fundamentally beings of energy. I believe that our collective consciousness is in a constant state of flux, influenced by the vibrations we emit and receive. This collective energy shift, in turn, impacts other energies in the world, creating a dynamic and interconnected web of influence.
His theories on the transformative power of hydrogen and the vibrational nature of elements echo my own understanding that energy is the essence of our existence. The notion that natural phenomena like hurricanes and tornadoes can reveal deeper mathematical and physical truths speaks to my inner conviction that energy governs all aspects of life. This idea may not directly correlate with established scientific models, but it profoundly resonates with my spiritual experiences and insights.
My belief is that energy is far more profound and impactful than we have ever fully acknowledged.The theory that energy and vibrations can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the universe speaks to me deeply. It validates my intuition that there is a vast, untapped potential in recognising and harnessing these energies. Howard's work encourages me to trust my inner knowing and continue exploring the profound mysteries of energy, consciousness, and their intricate dance within the universe.
Gravity
Terrence Howard challenges the conventional understanding of gravity, proposing an alternative view of how fundamental forces operate in the universe. His theories present a radical rethinking of how we perceive gravitational forces and the nature of matter, particularly in the context of reconstructing celestial bodies like Saturn.
Gravity as an Incomplete Concept
Howard argues that our current understanding of gravity is incomplete and that there are alternative forces or principles at play in the universe that can better explain the interactions and stability of matter. He believes that gravity, as traditionally understood, does not fully account for the complexities of how celestial bodies form and maintain their structure.
Instead of viewing gravity as the dominant force holding planets and other astronomical objects together, Howard suggests that other forces, possibly related to vibrational energy and frequencies, play a crucial role. These forces, he proposes, are more fundamental and pervasive than gravity, and by understanding them, we can gain new insights into the nature of the universe.
Rebuilding Saturn Without Gravity
Howard's theory on reconstructing Saturn without relying on gravity is rooted in his belief that the traditional gravitational model is insufficient. He posits that by leveraging the vibrational frequencies and energy fields that he believes govern the structure of matter, it would be possible to recreate or manipulate a planet like Saturn.
He proposes that every element and object in the universe emits a specific vibrational frequency. He believes that by tuning into these frequencies and manipulating them, it is possible to control the formation and stability of matter, including celestial bodies like Saturn. This idea challenges the conventional reliance on gravity, suggesting that the vibrational properties of matter hold the key to its structure and coherence.
The Concept of Vibrational Frequencies
According to Howard, each element has a unique vibrational signature—a specific frequency at which it resonates. These frequencies are akin to the unique tones produced by musical instruments. Just as different instruments produce distinct sounds, different elements emit distinct vibrational frequencies. By understanding and harnessing these frequencies, Howard argues that we can influence the behaviour and arrangement of matter on a fundamental level.
Application to Celestial Bodies: Saturn
For a complex structure like Saturn, Howard's theory suggests that the planet's stability and formation can be managed by identifying and manipulating its unique vibrational patterns. Instead of relying on gravity to hold Saturn together, we would tune into the specific frequencies that correspond to its various components—such as gases, rings, and core materials. By adjusting these frequencies, it would be possible to recreate and maintain the planet's structure.
Analogy: The Orchestra and the Symphony
To illustrate my interpretation of what I ‘think’ he means, here is an analogy.
The Orchestra:
Imagine an orchestra where each instrument represents a different element or component of Saturn. Each instrument produces a unique sound, much like each element emits a specific vibrational frequency.
The Symphony:
When the orchestra plays a symphony, the various sounds from each instrument combine to create a harmonious piece of music. In Howard's theory, the combined vibrational frequencies of Saturn's components create a stable, cohesive planet.
Tuning the Instruments:
To ensure the symphony sounds harmonious, each instrument must be finely tuned. Similarly, to reconstruct Saturn, one would need to finely tune the vibrational frequencies of its components. By adjusting these frequencies, the overall structure and stability of Saturn can be controlled, much like tuning the instruments ensures a harmonious performance.
Conducting the Symphony:
In this analogy, the conductor represents the force or intelligence that manipulates the vibrational frequencies. Just as a conductor directs the orchestra to play in harmony, an understanding of vibrational frequencies would allow us to direct and stabilise the components of Saturn, ensuring they resonate together in a cohesive manner.
Practical Implications
Howard's theory implies that by mastering the manipulation of vibrational frequencies, we could theoretically control the formation and stability of any celestial body. I also interpret this to mean we could also use this technique to travel through space & time!
Energy Fields and Stability
Terrence Howard's theory emphasises the role of energy fields in maintaining the stability of celestial bodies like Saturn, proposing that these fields are more fundamental than gravity. He believes that by understanding and manipulating these energy fields, we can control the formation and stability of matter in ways that traditional gravitational theories do not explain.
Energy Fields: The Invisible Framework
In Howard's view, energy fields are invisible frameworks that permeate the universe, holding matter together and maintaining its structure. These fields are interconnected with vibrational frequencies, creating a dynamic and cohesive system that governs the behaviour of particles and larger structures. The stability of any object, from atoms to planets, is thus a result of the harmonious interactions within these energy fields.
Analogy: The Tuning Fork and Water Surface
The Tuning Fork:
Imagine striking a tuning fork and holding it near a calm body of water. The vibrations from the tuning fork create ripples on the water's surface, spreading out in harmonious patterns. These ripples represent the vibrational frequencies that Howard believes are fundamental to all matter.
The Water Surface:
The surface of the water, in this analogy, represents the energy fields that Howard describes. Just as the ripples spread across the water, the vibrational frequencies interact with the energy fields, creating patterns that influence the stability and structure of objects.
Creating Stability:
Now, imagine that instead of just ripples, the tuning fork's vibrations could arrange and stabilise objects floating on the water's surface. The energy fields (water surface) and the vibrational frequencies (ripples) work together to create a stable, cohesive arrangement. This is akin to how Howard envisions energy fields and vibrational frequencies maintaining the integrity of celestial bodies like Saturn.
The following video illustrates this point beautifully I believe!
Video credit - https://www.instagram.com/crystalsandsound/
Conclusion
In considering Terrence Howard’s unconventional theories, it’s essential to acknowledge the broader context of scientific exploration and the importance of remaining open to new ideas, even those that challenge our current understanding. Howard’s theories, while controversial, stimulate crucial discussions about the nature of reality, the interplay of energy and matter, and the fundamental principles that govern the universe.
Howard’s emphasis on relative factors for achieving an objective understanding of the universe aligns with the broader pursuit of a unified field theory. This theory aims to consolidate all fundamental forces of nature into a single framework, reflecting the interconnectedness that Howard champions. Ignoring Howard’s insights outright would be a missed opportunity to explore potentially groundbreaking ideas. His assertions might seem radical, but they underscore the necessity of continuously questioning and evolving our scientific paradigms.
As a birth practitioner and transformational coach, I’m not claiming to possess the expertise of a physicist. My aim is to encourage dialogue and inspire curiosity. Howard’s ideas, even if not entirely accurate, could spark the right kind of thinking that leads to profound discoveries. It only takes one person to listen, ponder, and build upon these concepts to propel us toward the right answers.
I apologise if my interpretation of Howard’s theories isn’t perfect. My intention is to bridge the gap between scientific discourse and the profound sense of interconnectedness that many of us feel through spiritual practices. By keeping this conversation alive, we honour the spirit of inquiry that drives both scientific and spiritual exploration.
I have only touched upon his three-hour conversation and his amazing PDF, but I wanted to write down my understanding of it. It might help others. In essence, Howard’s theories encourage us to look beyond the surface, consider the deeper connections, and remain open to the transformative potential of radical ideas. Whether or not his specific claims hold up under scrutiny, the broader message is clear: to advance our understanding of the universe, we must be willing to question, explore, and embrace new perspectives.