Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Skúli Jakobsson's avatar

Fascinating train of thoughts!!! Please, continue 🙏

I came upon you from doc Malik yesterday. 😘

I am Icelandic and have worked with a few people from Poland.

Generational trauma is easily observed in Polish people that migrate to Iceland. They say so themselves. Iceland= 1000 years of peace. Poland = major war every few generations.

Expand full comment
Chris Osborn's avatar

“There’s a macro view we’re missing.”

I couldn’t agree more with that statement.

What exactly is it that we are missing?

In my opinion, what we are missing is how we view the most basic understanding of the Universe we exist in. I have spent the last 25 years unlearning my degree in Theoretical Physics and scientific understanding of the Universe because it is based on things/stuff. It is not able to look at and make sense of the non-physical aspects of the universe we live in.

This is not accidental, and is by design I believe.

Clif High uses the term “gritology” to describe the current conventional scientific understanding of the universe, rooted in

1 - Materialism

2 - Reductionism,

3 - Empirical focus

4 - Static and Mechanistic systems

5 - Einsteinian and Newtonian framework

This understanding only works sometimes and is not an encompassing understanding of the Universe. Whereas an Ontological understanding of the Universe makes sense for both the physical (holographic) and the non-physical aspects of our Universe

Ontological Understanding of the Universe

Ontology, in philosophy, is the study of being, existence, and the nature of reality. An ontological understanding of the universe focuses on the fundamental nature of what exists, asking questions like: What is the essence of the universe? What kinds of entities (eg matter, consciousness, universals) are fundamental? How do they interact to form reality?

Key features of an ontological perspective include:

1- Focus on Being: Ontology examines the nature of existence itself, distinguishing between particulars and universals, or concrete objects (existing in space-time) and abstract objects (like numbers).

2- Consciousness as Fundamental: In some ontological models, particularly those Clif High aligns with, consciousness is seen as the primary source of reality, with matter and energy being expressions or manifestations of consciousness. This contrasts with materialist views where matter is primary.

3 - Dynamic and Holistic: Ontological models often view reality as interconnected and dynamic, emphasizing complexity and the interdependence of consciousness, energy, and matter.

4 - Subjective and Objective Reality: Ontology can incorporate both objective (mind-independent) and subjective (mind-dependent) views of reality. Clif High’s ontology leans toward a subjective, consciousness-driven model where the universe actively participates in shaping reality through interaction with observers.

5 - Philosophical Roots: Ontology draws from ancient traditions (e.g., Vedic philosophy, Plato’s realism) and modern thinkers (e.g., Heidegger, Husserl, Russell), aiming to uncover the foundational structure of reality beyond empirical observation.

So, going back to your statement

“There’s a macro view we’re missing.”

What we are missing is an Ontological understanding of our Universe that can make sense of why parents who home birth, don’t take vaccines, eat healthy can birth neurodivergent children.

I believe the simple answer is Karma; Karma that we create in this current lifetime and lifetimes before. The understanding WHY is a lot more complex to make sense of and to come to terms with it! In this ontological understanding of the Universe we choose our parents.

We are all individually incredibly powerful and this accrued karma is fixable in terms of doing the inner healing you talk about and learning to listen to the Universe. It is talking to us all of the time, just comes down to whether we are able/know how to listen to it!

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts